Two years can feel like a lifetime in the digital camera market, with fresh faced models seemingly delivered on a frantic six month schedule. But that’s roughly how long my RX1 has been in service – two full years. It was the golden child back then, always with me, consistently impressing with the sweet render of its Zeiss Sonnar 35/2 and the jaw dropping dynamic range from the 24-megapixel sensor. But new interchangeable lens models were released by Sony and the RX1 would often be relegated to the drawer. The newer Alphas boast faster AF, built-it EVFs, higher resolution or better low light performance, and the ability to mount nearly every lens ever made for the format.
Funny thing though, the RX1 still deserves a place in the current stable and an argument can be made that it represents something wholly unique and special that can’t be duplicated by its siblings. It is the camera that I grab when I want to travel, go out with friends or just don’t want to think about lens options. There is a power in simplicity and limiting yourself to a single, classic 35mm lens. I rarely feel restricted with the fixed field of view and find that it is well suited for intimate scenes, landscapes and even portraits.
Given this ongoing admiration for the RX1 I decided to break down what makes the camera relevant today:
Like the legendary Hexar AF film compact and its Summicron killer 35/2, the heart of the RX1 is its fixed prime lens with silent leaf shutter. When the RX1 was released, the review sites gushed over the Sonnar that Sony had literally shoehorned into the frame to achieve the compact stature of the camera. With no less than three physical rings – aperture, focus and macro – the all metal Zeiss looks and feels the part of a classic rangefinder optic. Today, that lens is no less sharp, tactile or well built. You won’t find any test charts here but I’ve never been disappointed with the Sonnar’s resolving capability and its lovely rendering of out of focus areas. At times I’ve flirted with switching to the R model with no AA filter for improved resolution but photography isn’t solely about sharpness or resolution and there is a coherence inherent in this lens sensor combo that consistently satisfies.
With a leaf shutter, the lens is nearly silent and allows discrete shooting that lends itself to street, movie stills, sound recording environments or any other application where a silent shutter is a necessity. I often forget about the importance of having this ability until it is required.
The Sonnar does have its minor faults, but unless you are using an Otus, what lens doesn’t? Most notably, there is some CA that will need to be cleaned up on occasion, as well as distortion and vignetting that is magically erased in-camera. I never worry for a second that the lens is somehow hobbled or deficient. I would rate it as one of the finest 35/2 lenses made, equal to the Leica Summicron (king of bokeh), and Hexanon, better than the Minolta AF.
Relevancy today (10/10)
When released, the RX1 was a clear shot across Leica’s bow. It is considerably smaller than the digital M bodies with a similar level of build quality, yet houses a modern full frame sensor with exceptional capabilities. It truly was the first of its kind and has yet to be eclipsed. You often read words such as “exquisite”, “finest”, “teutonic”, “brick” or “tank” to describe its build and design. Nothing has changed over those two years, in-fact time has proven the validity of those early claims. The detents on all of the metal control dials and rings remain as firm as the day I unboxed the camera. Some mild brassing on the focus ring is the extent of visible wear, although I have encased the camera in a leather half case made by Ulysses in Japan. The camera comes from the factory with a small patch of griptec type material on the front right hand side and a modest thumb grip on the rear. These two features provide just enough surface tension to make single hand holding possible but there are many first or third-party options to improve the ergonomics if desired. The case I purchased provides a nice little leather grip integrated into the design and retains access to the battery and SD card.
Controls are decidedly manual, with the aforementioned aperture ring plus an exposure compensation dial with 3 stops of adjustment +/-. When shooting full manual or shutter priority, shutter speed is assigned to the rear thumb dial. Personally, I prefer this setup to a shutter speed dial on top of the body and find that the combination of physical dials and rings to be ideal for controlling aperture, shutter speed and exposure comp.
The display is perhaps the most contentious component of the design. In an apparent attempt to keep the body as compact as possible, the RX1 was delivered without an OVF, EVF or tilt-screen. You get a nice LCD with good visibility in bright light (on the Sunny Weather setting) but that’s it. Many refused to purchase a camera where you are required to use the stinky diaper technique of composition. Sony does offer an optional OVF or EVF solution but both are pricey and alter the compact form factor of the camera. Personally, I chose to purchase the EVF and find it to be an effective add-on that not only allows for eye-level viewing, but with its articulating eyepiece, you get a right-angle finder, rendering you less intrusive to subjects on the street.
It is remarkable to think that in many ways this CyberShot branded camera remains Sony’s finest design. I know I’m not alone in hoping that a new model will eventually be introduced that retains the same level of build quality along with the retro rangefinder aesthetic and maybe a few improvements. If not for the lack of a built-in viewfinder I would rate the body a 10/10 today.
Relevancy today (9/10)
As of the the date of this article, the RX1 sensor is the second highest rated in a Sony body, higher than any Canon camera and higher than any Medium Format system sensor – per DXO ratings. Pretty impressive for a two year old model. With 14.3 stops of dynamic range (widest range of all the Sony cameras), the ability of the sensor to hold highlights and recover shadows is truly astounding. I routinely overexpose when shooting in daylight at f/2, 1/2000 and have no trouble pulling back the highlights. High ISO performance is excellent and as a concert shooter, I have no qualms about using 3200 or even 6400 in a pinch. I rarely rely on software noise reduction as I find the noise pattern to be acceptable and even attractive in a film grain sense. Compared to the sensor in my newish a7II, I feel the RX1 sensor to be absolutely equal if not slightly advanced.
Relevancy today (10/10)
All new alpha cameras use an updated version of the RX1’s interface. Comparing those new menus to the RX1 can be a bit of a letdown. The RX1 menus are spartan and lack many helpful features found in the more recent models. One example is the inability to assign a function to the rear control ring – on the a7 models I keep ISO programmed to the ring for immediate control. On the RX1 you must program a custom button to first access ISO and then select the desired setting from the menu. There is potential for significant interface improvement so it is disappointing that firmware has not been upgraded to better synch the interface design with the current models.
Relevancy today (6/10)
Along with Interface, this section is where the RX1 most shows its age. Autofocus performance has been greatly improved in the newer alpha cameras so living with the older contrast detection system in the RX1 can at times be frustrating. On the upside, AF is generally very accurate, more so than my DSLRs ever were, it just takes the camera a bit longer to get there. Things are generally fine in good light but the hunting begins when the light goes down or in strong backlight conditions. Switching over to manual focus is always an option but the fly-by-wire mechanism requires its own form of patience and skill. Still, to put things in perspective, I have used the RX1 in extreme concert lighting conditions with solid success, just don’t expect it to provide the speed of today’s advanced systems.
Relevancy today (6/10)
A True Classic?
Given the frequency of product advancement in the mirrorless space, a photographer needs to be at peace with their purchase decision. Many agonize over the right time to buy or upgrade, scanning the rumor sites for hints at what is coming next. This cycle of advancement and obsolescence can paralyze or infuriate. With a camera like the RX1 I knew when I purchased it that there would be improvements in later models, specifically to the AF speed and interface. The question I had to ask myself was whether the things that made the camera unique were enough to warrant the considerable cost of the RX1. I did not buy the camera back in 2013 for the AF performance or the interface/menu controls, I bought it for the lens, sensor and body design/build and of course for its compact form. On its introduction the RX1 was the smallest full frame camera you could buy and two years later, continues to hold that title. Sony didn’t just make the smallest full frame camera in the world, they blessed it with arguably one of the finest sensor and lens combinations available and they wrapped it in a beautiful metal retro shell with manual aperture and exposure compensation controls. Due to its compact size and its handsome design – I’ll admit a bit of vanity here, I want to carry the camera with me all the time, confident that I am not compromising anything when it comes to the images it will help me produce.
Tomorrow Sony may announce a replacement with a faster lens, better AF and interface, maybe even an integrated EVF, but when it comes to the quality of the images, we are reaching a point of diminishing returns. What the RX1 produces today is without doubt at the top end of the spectrum, so good that I seriously worry whether a new model would “mess with success”.
Sony achieved a rarity when they designed the RX1 – they produced a camera that many will claim has already reached cult status, which in the throwaway and upgrade world of digital cameras, ensures its relevancy for many years.
Leave a comment below if you still own an RX1 or would like to.
About the author Chad Wadsworth
Chad is a Sony Artisan of Imagery and Red Bull Global Photographer based in Austin, TX.
Lens Review: Sony FE 50mm f/1.2 GM comparison to the legendary Zeiss Planar 80mm f/2 lens for the Contax 645 system
Sony 50mm f/2.5 G Lens Review: All the G you need?
Lens Review: Sony FE 135mm f/1.8 GM Return of the King
Wonderful post Chad! Enjoy your site and always love reading your take on photography. Interested on how you utilize vsco; would love to see a post on how you use it in your workflow. Keep you the fantastic work!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Agreed. My RX1R is as much a gem today as it was when I bought it. I’ve been shooting off my D810 and Sony A7 series lately. Also Fuji and Canon. Your post motivates me to take RX out more now, perhaps on my next road trip. Nice post!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Excellent point! As a long time Leica owner and shooter I prefer to take my RX1R 90% of the time with me.It’s truly a gem and even with new RX on the horizon it’s still a keeper.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I wanna replace my Fuji X100S and is really in a big dilemma whether to hold out on those “Mark II or Rx2 rumors” slated for this month, or just go ahead and grab the Rx1 today!
Tough call. The X100s is a great camera – I definitely enjoy the hybrid VF experience but would rather work with the Bayer sensor of the RX1. Looks like Leica has an RX1 competitor coming in a couple days so hopefully those RX2 rumors are accurate.
Just go get one refurbished for what, $1400, now a days? I had both the X100S and RX1 for about a month, and I wanted to keep the Fuji so badly, it’s such a fun little camera with the OVF and form factor, but there was just no way to let the little RX1 go. This blog post encapsulates the type of output, color, out of focus smoothness, and rendering that RX1 has over the alternatives. If they improve autofocus in the RX2, unless you have children or fast moving objects, I am not sure that you would not learn to love the RX1’s quirks.
Congratulations very impressive photos. Τhere is a film-like rendering in many of them that I really like. This is really making the camera much more desirable, although I won’t be able to afford one anytime soon. Is it due to the lens? Maybe the Full-frame sensor? Do you apply some post-processing to achieve that?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for the kind words. Yes, I apply processing to most if not all my RAW files. The look you comment on is a combination of the lens, sensor and processing.
Save up, prices on the used market are coming down and if Sony ever introduces an RX2, expect them to go even lower for a little while!
I just bought one, actually i change my A7+35mm to RX1 and have no regrets! The camera is awesome!
Your postprocessing is amazing! Can you share some presets for ACR/Lightroom if it is possible?
I have used the RX1 almost exclusively for the past two years. The IQ is very high and leaves you resentful if you have to to settle for less. Having one fixed focal length lens challenges you and I believe makes you approach photography in a more creative manner, but does mean some shots, longer and wider, will be missed
I think the A7RII will be my next camera but can’t see me parting with the RX1.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Amazing write up. Passion invoked throughout entire article, not just from writer but to reader too. Makes me want one. Only thing holding me back is 4k video seems to be way forward and a replacement is most likely to have this feature. Even 8k video is not very far away in terms of content creation.
A pet hate of mine when people always say I’d buy this only if it had this or that just on little things. But yet I’m doing it here.
But this is the ultimate camera if ok with 35mm. However I do think of life with a7s ii with 35mm 2.8 and 135mm fe lens. Ultimate setup for me there. But then that 35mm 2.8 lens not as good as rx1 lens.
Aaargh the mind boggles.
Tldr; amazing article. Amazing camera.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Every time I think of selling my RX1R for getting A7 ii or something else, it produces something great. I bought it for full price and selling it, won’t get much back, might as well keep it for 35mm length. The only thing I wish it had was image stabilisation to go that extra stop at night. But then you can always increase ISO
LikeLiked by 1 person
I still have my RX1 too. Keep thinking about selling it for an A7 series. But for some reason, every time I take it out, the much smaller size keeps me from making that decision.
I love this camera too. I have a Nikon D800 w/ the Sigma f/1.4 and it’s amazing and way more versatile but ever since I bought the RX1 I carry it on me all the time and the D800 stays home far too much. After waiting for the RX2 for so long I gave in and bought the viewfinder (EVF). It’s really nice and a worthwhile upgrade to the camera. Faster AF, a built in viewfinder and more responsive drive by wire lens, are my hopes for the new RX1 mk 2 if it ever happens. It would be REALLY nice if Sony were to grace us with just ONE firmware update.
Fantastic right up and images to back it up. I sold my rx1 and regret it to this day. I am itching to buy it back but waiting for an announcement for the mark 2. Hoping that happens and in the meantime I may end up getting the FE 35mm f/1.4 for my Sony A7ii
The RX1 is still one of the finest cameras, just like the A900 is still one of the finest cameras. I am still using them and I have more modern cameras…
One thing: the RX2 could improve with an integrated viewfinder, articulated screen AND stabilisation. If it had all this (and still keeps the wonderful lens), it would be just perfect.
Well, we got two out of the three 🙂
Terrific article, thanks for your thoughts and for posting them.
I personally bought the RX1 (used) a year ago, after a big operation that left me unable to travel with my “normal” camera rig (Canon 5D2 and lenses). I bought an RX1003 (which I love, for what it can do) and even used it professionaly on a couple of portrait gigs (in a pinch). Of course the 1″ sensor is a little limited in terms of resolution and controlling the depth of field……hence the RX1.
While I can get those shallow depth of field portraits with the RX1, my copy does seem to be a little challenged, focus-wise, and it’s hard to get consistently sharp pictures, even stopping down to f/2.8. While I did go ahead and buy (again, used) an EVF, it’s a bit of a hassle to use, compared to the on-board one in the RX100m3. And, when I compare the results I get with the RX1 to those I can achieve with my 5Dm3 and a 35mm f/1.4L, well, no comparison.
Still, that said, for travel (and we travel a lot) I’m completely sold on the small, lightweight camera idea. In some ways, I also like the limitation of a fixed prime 35, although I do find there are some situations where I really do need a wider or longer lens. You have to really “inhabit the role” of the photographer with the RX1 and really step up to the plate to get the picture (read, portraits); there is no “eavesdropping” option, as with a long lens. You have to get right up in there, which of course, affects the outcome of the picture (and the shoot).
I will look forward either to a firmware update to the RX1, or, an RX2 or RX1mk2; might even pick one up new if the price isn’t prohibitive as in $2,700 US for the RX1.
[…] RX1 was recently sold to fund said new model – but I’ve written about my extensive history with the original and after spending a weekend shooting the hard to find Q, a few things have […]
I sold my original RX1 to buy a mark 2 but I see a real difference in rendering and was curious if anyone else did also?
To me the newer RX1 is too sharp, the rendering and fall off looks much different to me. I would love all the new specs but at what cost.