Close

Sony FE 16-35mm f/2.8 G Master Review

With each new digital camera release we move further away from the dirtier elements of photography. No longer do digital sensors struggle with anemic dynamic range and poor low light performance. Everything is “clean” these days.

At the same time, lenses are being polished and aligned, exotic elements added and AF systems improved until they are the ultimate in optics. Sony’s GM line (or G Master) is their play at this high-end of lens design. I was lucky enough to get some pre-release time with their newest entry in the GM line, the FE 16-35mm f/2.8 GM. The questions I wanted to answer were whether this new lens was going to be too clinical, or was there going to be some glaring deficiency that I couldn’t overlook.


 

 

No doubt, the lens is well constructed, just like the other GM models. High quality plastics, metal and glass are combined in an attractive design with solid ribbing for focus and zoom rings. There is a customizable focus hold button, AF/MF switch and aperture ring. If you’ve seen the GM 24-70mm, then you might mistake this new model for it, save the smaller dimensions and weight. Compared to smaller prime lenses, I grudgingly accept that the GM 16-35mm is larger but don’t think it too large or too heavy – especially considering I would be packing fewer lenses.

To that point, zooms are extremely flexible, can save you the cost and complexity of purchasing multiple lenses, and the hassle of switching them in the field. For a wedding or event photographer, or a photo journalist, the ability to instantly vary your field of view is essential. I recently admitted to myself that I was booking more work that would benefit from that kind of flexibility, as long as it didn’t sacrifice quality.

As flexible as they are, we are asking the lens designers to do almost the impossible – craft a single optic that is essentially multiple distinct lenses, each with their own unique characteristics. You know what your 35mm lens will do for you, what scenes to use it for and what results you can expect. Replace that 35mm with a 16mm or 24mm lens, and you have completely different expectations.

Kando_0001.jpg

28mm f/2.8 ISO 400

The new lens has me thinking. What are photographers looking for in a modern wide zoom? Do they expect perfectly sharp edge-to-edge at all apertures; attractive bokeh at all subject distances; no chromatic aberrations or lens flare ever? This is what people are asking for today, right? A Holy Grail of sorts. I’m pretty sure that lens does not exist, nor would you want it to. What we do have in the GM is an impressively high performer – perhaps class leading in several categories – but also a lens that renders beautifully in many traditional ways. What follows are selections from essentially two weeks worth of shooting with the lens.

Kando_0004.jpg

35mm f/2.8 ISO 100 cropped

Those familiar with my work will know that the bulk is music related photography – live music, behind the scenes documentary, etc. I don’t normally shoot much wider than 25mm so having the option to expand the scene to 16mm presented new opportunities. For this first set of images, the wider aspect captured many interesting details and moments that would have been lost on a tighter crop.

Please note that all images are edited to my taste so may not be representative of a neutral test of color and contrast. Click on thumbnails for larger images.

JMBLYA_0001

JMBLYA Fest fans 16mm f/3.2 ISO 1600

JMBLYA_0001-2

Steve Aoki @ 35mm f/2.8 ISO 2000


Next up are some studio and natural light fashion portraits. These samples were shot exclusively on the long end at 35mm – a field of view that can be suprisingly impactful for portraits. The GM rendered the following image beautifully, with ultra sharp details and smooth transitions reminiscent of a fast prime. In the studio, with the lens stopped down to f/7 on the a7RII, the detail is stunning.

Fashion_0001.jpg

Nina – 35mm f/2.8 ISO 100

Fashion_0003.jpg

Nina – 35mm f/7.1 ISO 100

Fashion_0004.jpg

Nina – 35mm f/7.1 ISO 100

For this last outdoor scene, I certainly gave the image a more aggressive treatment but the basic rendering of the lens, combined with the a7RII’s resolution, left me feeling a medium format look.

Fashion_0002.jpg

Nina – 35mm f/2.8 ISO 640


One of my favorite locations to test out a new lens is the South Austin Cultural Museum. The sun beaten art cars and murals present a good mix of interesting subjects. In the first photo I wanted to see how the lens handled color, edge detail and vignetting at 16mm and then immediately following, I went tight to 35mm for detail of an art car. Those are two drastically different types of photos but the 16-35mm GM handled both as well as my best primes – truly impressive.

Art Cars_0002.jpg

16mm f/5.6 ISO 100

Art Cars_0001.jpg

35mm f/2.8 ISO 100


A few days after the new lens arrived, I had an opportunity to fulfill a lifelong dream and fly a glider. The 30 minute discovery flights gave my son and I both about ten minutes on the stick for an intense ride, circling thermals and finding lift. In the constraints of the glider’s cockpit, even 16mm felt a little tight (maybe the new FE 12-24mm f/4 would have been better) but I appreciated the flexibility of shooting details at 35mm and then switching to a wider fov as needed. Full disclosure, my son is a much better “pilot” than me.


A friend recently called me up looking for some content for his studio. This job was a perfect example of work that would be well suited for a wide zoom like the FE 16-35 f/2.8 GM. Keith Kreeger’s beautiful plates are made by his hand and are used in many of the country’s finest restaurants. I was concerned about the mixed lighting in the studio and how the GM would handle it – wanting the images to have a smooth, organic feel to them that I think the lens ultimately produced. It was also nice to not have to switch lenses in a studio filled with particulates waiting to invade the a7RII’s sensor the second it was exposed. For the final shot I used a single off camera Sony HVL-F32M flash for a studio look that balanced the exposure on the plates with a neon “porcelain” sign in the back of the room.

Keith Kreeger_0006

Keith Kreeger_0008


For this series, I needed to produce some images of a home remodel. I’ve shot a good amount of interiors for architects and editorial so am familiar with the demands of the genre and the need for a low distortion lens. I was skeptical that a zoom could handle the task and not produce ugly distortion of the horizontals and verticals. I was pleasantly surprised. In fact, the success of the 16-35mm GM on this job is what convinced me this lens needs a place in my bag. The lens seems to excel at the traditional field of view for interiors (24mm or wider), with excellent sharpness out to the corners. When editing I used the older lens profile for the FE 16-35 f/4 since there wasn’t one yet available for the GM. That profile handled any minor pincushion or barrel distortion nicely and I didn’t see any evidence of mustache distortion.

I did get a model release for the bulldog.

Interiors_0001

Interiors_0008


With summer almost here, I’ll close out with a few shots featuring fitness model Katerina Schload taken at the quirky cool Austin Motel. The GM handled everything from a tight fashion portrait to wide landscapes with results equal or greater than most primes.

Austin Motel_0004.jpg

35mm f/2.8 ISO 100

Austin Motel_0002.jpg

35mm f/8 ISO 100

Austin Motel_0003.jpg

28mm f/7.1 ISO 100

Austin Motel_0001.jpg

16mm f/8 ISO 125

The best thing I can say about the FE 16-35mm f/2.8 GM is that it made me forget I was shooting a zoom both during the capture and more impressively, during the edit. Unless you absolutely need a faster lens for something like an ultra low-light concert environment, it easily handles a wide variety of conditions with results that will satisfy even prime snobs like myself. There was nothing about the GM that made me feel constrained in any way. Auto focus was quick and accurate, colors were neutral and sharpness was excellent. But most importantly, this lens, while “clean”, never felt clinical. That’s important to someone who cares less about ultimate specs and more about how the lens draws a scene. My eyes and my gut tell me that this is a lens that will be deservedly well regarded by Sony shooters.

7 Comments

  1. Thanks for another relate-able review Chad. Thought I’d mention it as I like your reviews, not too ‘clinical’ and always backed up with good real world shots and not MTF charts. Please keep it up. Cheers

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply

    1. Thanks for stopping by and glad you enjoyed the read!

      Like

      Reply

  2. Patrick Cochrane May 23, 2017 at 2:03 am

    Excellent Review!
    Many thanks!
    P.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply

  3. Excellent photography here, no matter of the lens.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply

  4. […] Chad Wadsworth tested the new 16-35mm f/2.8 GM lens and writes: […]

    Like

    Reply

  5. […] Chad Wadsworth tested the Sony FE 16-35mm f/2.8 G Master: “My eyes and my gut tell me that this is a lens that will be deservedly well regarded by Sony shooters.” […]

    Like

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: