Close

NFL with the Sony a7RIII and a9

A few weeks ago I received a message from Sony Artisan of Imagery Gene Lower, team photographer for the Arizona Cardinals. Gene is one of those guys that gives freely of his knowledge and has been offering up very special opportunities to shoot NFL games to his fellow Sony Artisans. As an advisor to the Tokyo based product team, he was also an unsung force in the development of the acclaimed Sony a9. So when Gene presented the chance to shoot the Cardinals at their away game in Houston, I didn’t hesitate.


 

NFL Post-0016

Gene Lower, Arizona Cardinals team photographer

As luck would have it, my local Sony rep was also in possession of the new a7RIII and was kind enough to loan it out for the day. My plan was to compare the a7RIII to the a9 as a sports shooter. With both cameras in the bag, I hopped in the car and and trucked down highway 71, for the two-and-a-half hour drive from Austin to Houston.

NFL Post-0003NFL Post-0010NFL Post-0004NFL Post-0012NFL Post-0018

Along with the two cameras, I packed the Sony 70-200mm f/2.8 GM, 85mm f/1.4 GM and 16-35mm f/2.8 GM lenses, the new Voigtlander 40mm f/1.2, and the Sony 1.4x tele converter. My initial plan was to shoot the 70-200mm GM with the 1.4x converter in crop mode on the A7RIII. That combination would result in an 18mp image at 150-420mm f/4. I wasn’t worried about reach, as my goal was to document the game in its entirety, not just grab that super compressed long tele shot that the pros seem focused on. I was more interested in flexibility and a wide range of coverage, while keeping my kit as compact as possible.

What I’ve failed to mention so far is that this experience turned out to be a bit of a cautionary tale. Most pros will advise against shooting critical work with new, untested gear but having used the a7RII since its release several years ago, and not having any client demands for the shoot, I fully ignored that conventional wisdom.

NFL Post-0001NFL Post-0002NFL Post-0007NFL Post-0005NFL Post-0014

Arriving on the field just as the game kicked off, my adrenaline was rushing. I enjoy approaching a brand new shoot without the baggage of previous experience – it’s both nerve wracking and empowering. The visual stimulus on the field was almost overwhelming but how can a photographer complain about that?

Initial configuration was the 85mm GM on the a9 and the 70-200mm GM on the a7RIII. I had the 70-200mn set for lock-on flexible spot, continuous AF and Hi+ drive speed, which I thought would result in 10fps with continuous AF tracking and no EVF blackout. For the first few series of on-field action, I was so focused on the new experience, the movement, the angles, etc., I didn’t pay too much attention to the drive speed but did notice that the EVF seemed to be lagging a bit – reminding me of the old “last-frame-shot viewing” of the previous model. Due to excitement, that lag didn’t register deeply, nor did the apparently slower than expected drive speed. The AF performance seemed to be outstanding, and I was happy with what I was seeing on the monitor but still, something seemed off.

NFL Post-0011NFL Post-0020NFL Post-0033NFL Post-0030NFL Post-0031NFL Post-0028

During a Cardinals drive in the red zone, I setup in the corner of the end zone with the a7RIII in hand and the a9/85mm GM sitting next to me on the turf. Due to my proximity to the action, if by chance a Cardinal wide receiver ran to the corner, I was going to have to quickly switch to the a9, and that’s exactly what happened. The moment I saw the quarterback cock his arm to throw to my corner, I dropped the a7RIII, picked up the a9 and acquired focus on the wide receiver rushing towards me. Whoah! not only did the camera instantly come out of sleep and grab focus, but I was reminded that the zero blackout EVF performance of the a9 made tracking the action at effortless. Even better, the play resulted in a touchdown and I was pretty sure I had captured it!

Indeed, reviewing the images after I finished shooting the touchdown celebration, the a9 had done its job well. What a rush.

NFL Post-0008NFL Post-0009NFL Post-0023NFL Post-0024NFL Post-0025NFL Post-0026

So was the a9 just that much better than the a7RIII at capturing action? In the heat of the shoot, I was more interested in capturing content, so after that touchdown, I swapped lenses and started shooting the 70-200mm on the a9 and relegated the a7RIII to environmental. It wasn’t until the game was over and I was back home in Austin evaluating the a7RIII performance that I realized a couple of critical configuration mistakes had been made.

Per the a7RIII manual (yes, you should read the manual), the following considerations need to be kept in mind when shooting continuous drive:

  • The shooting speed during continuous shooting becomes slower when [ RAW File Type] is set to [Uncompressed].
  • The shooting speed during continuous shooting becomes slower when [e-Front Curtain Shut.] is set to [Off] in [Continuous Shooting: Hi], [Continuous Shooting: Mid] or [Continuous Shooting: Lo] mode.
  • When the F-value is greater than F8 in [Continuous Shooting: Hi+], [Continuous Shooting: Hi] or [Continuous Shooting: Mid] mode, the focus is locked to the setting in the first shot.
  • The subject is not displayed in real-time on the monitor or viewfinder when shooting in [Continuous Shooting: Hi+] mode.

Realizing that RAW was set to Uncompressed and Continuous Shooting set to Hi+, I had unintentionally hobbled the performance of the a7RIII! But hey, mistakes are a part of learning and I’m happy to share this experience if it helps clarify how to configure the a7RIII for action. Once I correctly dialed in the settings, the a7III was shooting 8fps in Live View with the electronic shutter and minimal lag – the camera will also do 8fps with the mechanical shutter. As painful as this lesson was, in a way it solidified my appreciation for the a7RIII – this is truly a do-it-all camera that, unless you are shooting something as specialized as professional sports, will suit almost any photographer. Eight frames per second, with no blackout and 42mp is just outstanding.

NFL Post-0006NFL Post-0013NFL Post-0015NFL Post-0029NFL Post-0032NFL Post-0034

Configuration mistakes aside, the a7RIII was a dream to shoot. The camera is basically a high megapixel workhorse in a9 dress. The body feels like the a9, with identical footprint (my a9 half case fits the a7RIII perfectly) and controls, minus the a9’s extra dials on the top left hand of the body. Shooting the cameras side-by-side was seamless, with no operational friction moving between the bodies. This represents a significant achievement for Sony as they have now successfully evolved the a7 line to the a9 form and function. We are at a point in mirrorless development where ease of use and operational performance are at parity with image quality.

NFL Post-0021NFL Post-0020NFL Post-0027NFL Post-0022NFL Post-0035NFL Post-0019

Because my workflow lives in Adobe Lightroom, at the time of writing, I was unable to evaluate the a7RIII RAW performance, but I have zero concerns if reports of similarity to a7RII files are accurate. I’m not a fan of post processing JPEGs but I did attempt to edit the a7RIII files to match my a9 RAW edits. I’m definitely looking forward to digging into the a7RIII RAW files, but I think JPEG shooters will be more than pleased.

Special thanks again to Gene Lower for the opportunity to shoot an NFL game. In many ways, shooting pro sports is similar to my main genre – live music. The frenetic energy of the game and the passion of the fans in the stadium was something I won’t soon forget.

Checkout the full gallery with EXIF info below…

 

 

6 Comments

  1. […] more serious and useful new A7rIII tests and reviews: NFL with the Sony a7RIII and a9 by Chad Wadsworth. Sony a7RIII Review by Dan […]

    Like

    Reply

  2. Really nice NFL gallery. I enjoyed the pictures taken with the 85GM. Perfect blurred backround filled with audience.

    I really like shooing my A7rII with JPGs straight out of cam. Therefore I do all necessary adjustments in the camera body.
    Are these photos all JPGs? What Sony color profile and white balance did you use?

    Like

    Reply

    1. Thanks Chris. All the a9 files were RAW, while the a7RIII were JPEG – standard profile, auto WB.

      Like

      Reply

  3. as always very nice review. Could you make a new revie with a7iii and contax g lenses if there is a improvement in focus performance and if the adapter enable also eye or face detection?
    best regards

    Like

    Reply

    1. Thanks Gio.

      I won’t be doing a review on the a7RIII with the Techart G adapter since I am not very pleased with its performance in general (not just on the a7RIII). My copy locks up every 5-10 frames and even worse, my Techart Pro M-adapter simply hunts and hunts. I wouldn’t recommend either adapter today although I understand they may have some new versions under development so we’ll see. As far as the eye-AF feature, it does work with the a7RIII and G adapter (until the adapter locks up the camera).

      Like

      Reply

      1. Thank you for the fast reply. ummm i wasn’t aware of these problem…what a bummer… I will really like to use my contax g lenses…let’s see what is coming up with adapters. then i think i will go for the rx1r ii. how is your experience with lowlight focus performance for journalistic reportage?

        all the best.

        Gio

        Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: